Tweet
Bootlegs from KOTD, GTEC, TDL, COLORADORAP, NOCOAST and porn have all been posted here.
After rethinking everything after getting off the phone with SMACK and CHICO, I'm was left with a tough decision.
DELETE THE BOOTLEGS OR DIE BY MY WORD!
URLTV gets no special treatment here.
They have never promoted OTBVA once.
Every other battle league has promoted OTBVA, and still bootlegs went uncensored.
1 call/message from any of URLTV STAFF to me or anyone else on this site will ignite a fury of retribution that has never been seen before.
YOU ARE FREE TO POST ANY Battle Bootleg!
:blegit:
Fux wit me my niggaz!
Legal Statement:
"It would be impossible for service providers to screen each of their millions of postings for possible problems. Faced with potential liability for each message republished by their services, interactive computer service providers[morgz] might choose to severely restrict the number and type of messages posted. Congress considered the weight of the speech interests implicated and chose to immunize service providers to avoid any such restrictive effect."
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (a common name for Title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996) is a landmark piece of Internet legislation in the United States, codified at 47 U.S.C. ยง 230. Section 230(c)(1) provides immunity from liability for providers and users of an "interactive computer service" who publish information provided by others
After rethinking everything after getting off the phone with SMACK and CHICO, I'm was left with a tough decision.
DELETE THE BOOTLEGS OR DIE BY MY WORD!
URLTV gets no special treatment here.
They have never promoted OTBVA once.
Every other battle league has promoted OTBVA, and still bootlegs went uncensored.
1 call/message from any of URLTV STAFF to me or anyone else on this site will ignite a fury of retribution that has never been seen before.
YOU ARE FREE TO POST ANY Battle Bootleg!
:blegit:
Fux wit me my niggaz!
Legal Statement:
"It would be impossible for service providers to screen each of their millions of postings for possible problems. Faced with potential liability for each message republished by their services, interactive computer service providers[morgz] might choose to severely restrict the number and type of messages posted. Congress considered the weight of the speech interests implicated and chose to immunize service providers to avoid any such restrictive effect."
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (a common name for Title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996) is a landmark piece of Internet legislation in the United States, codified at 47 U.S.C. ยง 230. Section 230(c)(1) provides immunity from liability for providers and users of an "interactive computer service" who publish information provided by others
Comment